GDPR compliance is essential for SaaS platforms handling data from EU residents. Non-compliance risks fines up to €20 million or 4% of global revenue, plus operational restrictions. Here’s a quick breakdown of what you need to know:

• Who needs to comply? Any SaaS platform processing personal data of EU residents, regardless of business location.
• Core principles: Focus on minimizing data collection, using it only for stated purposes, and ensuring security.
• Challenges: Multi-tenant data isolation, managing cross-border transfers, fulfilling user rights like data deletion, and maintaining detailed records.
• Key steps to compliance:
  • Encrypt data in transit and at rest.
  • Limit access through role-based controls and multi-factor authentication.
  • Vet third-party vendors and ensure they sign Data Processing Agreements (DPAs).
  • Use Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) for international data transfers.
  • Respond to data breaches within 72 hours, with clear plans for notification.
  • Conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk processing.
  • Appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO) if required.
  • Train employees on GDPR responsibilities.

Compliance builds trust and protects your business. By embedding privacy into your operations and working with compliant vendors, you safeguard user data and meet legal obligations.

How To Ensure Your SaaS Is GDPR Compliant? - The SaaS Pros Breakdown

Core GDPR Principles for SaaS Platforms

Navigating GDPR compliance starts with understanding its core principles. These principles shape how SaaS platforms handle personal data, focusing on collection, processing, and security. Let’s dive into two foundational ideas - data minimization and purpose limitation - and explore how they reduce risks tied to data handling.

Data Minimization and Purpose Limitation

Data minimization emphasizes collecting only the personal data that’s absolutely necessary for specific and legitimate purposes. It challenges the all-too-common practice of gathering excessive user data "just in case." For SaaS platforms, this means being selective. For example, if you’re running a project management tool, you might need users' email addresses for account setup and communication, but asking for their phone numbers might be unnecessary - unless SMS notifications are a core feature.

Purpose limitation complements this by ensuring that personal data is used strictly for the reasons stated at the time of collection. For instance, if you collect email addresses for account verification, you can’t later use them for marketing without obtaining separate consent. This principle also impacts feature development. If you introduce a new feature requiring additional data processing - like user behavior analytics - you must clearly inform users and ensure it aligns with your stated purposes. In some cases, explicit user consent might be required.

Keeping track of what data is collected, why it’s collected, and how it’s used is essential. Thorough documentation will help you stay compliant and transparent.

User Rights and Transparency Requirements

Under GDPR, individuals have eight specific rights concerning their personal data, and SaaS platforms must make it easy for users to exercise these rights. Some of the most common requests include data access, correction (rectification), and deletion (erasure).

For example, users can submit Subject Access Requests (SARs) to access their personal data. Companies are required to respond within one month, with extensions allowed only for complex cases and with prior notice. To streamline this process, consider implementing a user-friendly interface or self-service portal. Instead of requiring formal written requests, allow users to download their data, update their profiles, or delete their accounts directly through a dashboard.

When responding to SARs, ensure the process is both thorough and secure. Mistakes like sharing incomplete data, exposing other users’ information, or leaving sensitive metadata unredacted can lead to compliance issues. A structured approach - covering identity verification, data extraction from all systems (including backups), proper redaction, and secure delivery - is critical.

Transparency goes beyond individual requests. Your privacy policy should clearly explain what data you collect, how it’s used, who it’s shared with, and how long it’s retained. Write this in plain, easy-to-understand language so users don’t need legal expertise to grasp your practices.

Once user rights are addressed, the next step is identifying a valid legal basis for processing personal data.

Legal Basis for Processing Personal Data

Every action involving personal data on your SaaS platform must have a valid legal basis under GDPR. The three most relevant for SaaS businesses are contract performance, consent, and legitimate interests.

• Contract performance: This applies to data processing essential for delivering your core service. For instance, processing email addresses, passwords, and account preferences falls under this category because it’s necessary for users to access the platform they signed up for.
• Consent: Required for non-essential activities like marketing or advanced analytics. Consent must be freely given, clear, and specific. Pre-checked boxes or bundled agreements (forcing users to consent to multiple purposes at once) don’t meet GDPR standards.
• Legitimate interests: This covers situations where processing serves a valid business need - like fraud prevention or service improvements - without overriding users’ privacy rights. However, you’ll need to conduct a legitimate interests assessment to document why this basis applies and ensure it doesn’t disproportionately impact users.

Your choice of legal basis affects user rights. For example, data processed under consent can be withdrawn at any time, while data tied to contract performance is typically retained as long as the user has an active account. Document these decisions carefully and ensure your privacy policy reflects the correct legal basis for each type of data processing. This not only helps with compliance but also builds trust with users and regulators.

Technical Security Measures and Policies

After laying the legal groundwork for handling personal data, the next step is to implement strong security measures. GDPR emphasizes the importance of "appropriate technical and organizational measures" to protect user data. This means combining technical safeguards with clear policies to ensure data security.

Data Encryption and Access Controls

Encryption is your first line of defense against potential breaches. While GDPR doesn't mandate specific encryption standards, it's widely regarded as essential for safeguarding personal data. Your SaaS platform should encrypt data both in transit and at rest.

For data in transit, use TLS 1.2 or higher to secure API calls, file uploads, and synchronization processes. Don't overlook internal communication between servers, databases, and third-party services. For data at rest, apply AES-256 encryption to secure databases, backup systems, and temporary files or logs containing personal data. Always manage encryption keys internally to maintain control.

Role-based access controls (RBAC) work alongside encryption to limit data access to authorized personnel. Following the principle of least privilege, employees should only access the data necessary for their job. Adjust or revoke access promptly when roles change or employees leave.

To further secure access, enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative accounts and anyone handling sensitive data. Keep a detailed log of who has access to what, and review these permissions regularly.

For development and testing environments, consider using data masking or pseudonymization. Instead of exposing real customer data, create anonymized datasets that mimic the structure and relationships of your actual data.

Finally, ensure your system is prepared for potential breaches with proactive monitoring and a well-defined response plan.

Data Breach Monitoring and Response

GDPR's 72-hour notification rule makes it essential to have a robust breach detection and response strategy. If a breach poses a high risk to individuals' rights and freedoms, you must notify the supervisory authority within 72 hours. In cases of significant risk to personal data, users must also be informed "without undue delay."

Use automated monitoring systems to detect unusual activity, such as failed login attempts, unexpected data access, or unusual export patterns. Many SaaS platforms rely on SIEM tools to aggregate and analyze security logs for signs of breaches.

Your incident response plan should clearly outline roles and responsibilities, such as who decides if a breach needs to be reported, who contacts the supervisory authority, and how affected users will be informed. Testing this plan regularly ensures your team is prepared to act quickly and effectively.

When a breach occurs, document everything: timelines, affected data, causes, and steps taken to resolve the issue. This documentation is crucial for regulatory reporting and demonstrates your commitment to addressing the incident.

Prepare templates for breach notifications to save time during an incident. These should include letters for both regulatory authorities and users, with placeholders for incident-specific details. User notifications should be straightforward, explaining what happened, what data was involved, what actions you're taking, and how users can protect themselves.

With breach detection and response covered, the next step is to assess privacy risks and appoint key roles to oversee compliance.

Data Protection Impact Assessments and DPOs

Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) are required for activities that pose a high risk to individuals' privacy, such as large-scale data processing, systematic monitoring, or using new technologies that might affect privacy.

For SaaS platforms, DPIAs are often necessary when launching features involving extensive tracking, AI-powered analytics, or new third-party integrations handling personal data. A DPIA identifies risks, evaluates their likelihood and impact, and outlines measures to mitigate them.

A DPIA should include details about the nature, scope, and purpose of data processing, as well as its necessity and proportionality. It should also assess risks to individuals and outline mitigation strategies. When possible, consider user input - such as surveys - on how they feel about new data uses like behavioral tracking.

Data Protection Officers (DPOs) are mandatory for organizations that regularly monitor individuals on a large scale or process sensitive data extensively. SaaS companies offering analytics, marketing automation, or behavior tracking often fall into this category.

A DPO should have deep knowledge of data protection laws and practices. They must oversee compliance, conduct audits, advise on DPIAs, and serve as a contact for supervisory authorities. Importantly, the DPO must operate independently and cannot be dismissed for fulfilling their duties.

For smaller SaaS companies, designating a privacy lead can be an effective way to manage compliance efforts. This individual can coordinate privacy initiatives, monitor regulatory updates, and act as a go-to resource for data protection questions.

sbb-itb-8abf120

Third-Party Integrations and Data Transfers

Managing third-party integrations is a crucial part of ensuring compliance with GDPR standards. Many SaaS platforms depend on third-party services like Stripe for payments or Google Analytics for tracking user behavior. While these tools enhance your platform's capabilities, they also come with added responsibilities. If these services process your users' personal data, they become part of your data processing chain, meaning you're accountable for their compliance, too. Once you’ve established strong internal security measures, aligning third-party and international data practices with GDPR should be your next priority.

Evaluating Third-Party Vendor Compliance

To ensure compliance, you’ll need to evaluate each third-party service you work with. This isn’t a one-and-done task - it requires ongoing documentation and periodic reviews.

Start by requesting a Data Processing Agreement (DPA) from each vendor, as outlined in GDPR Article 28. This document should detail the scope, duration, and purpose of data processing, as well as the types of personal data involved. The DPA must also confirm that the vendor will process data only as instructed, maintain strong security protocols, and assist with data subject requests when necessary.

Vendors like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Mailchimp often provide pre-prepared DPAs that meet GDPR requirements. Smaller vendors, however, may need guidance on what to include. Beyond the DPA, check for security certifications such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001, which indicate that independent auditors have reviewed the vendor’s data protection practices.

Geographic location is another key factor. Vendors based in the EEA (European Economic Area) simplify compliance, but for those outside the EEA, additional safeguards are required. Request documentation detailing the vendor’s data retention policies, breach notification processes, and subprocessor arrangements. For example, Amazon Web Services provides a list of subprocessors and notifies customers of updates, ensuring visibility into their data processing chain.

By thoroughly vetting your third-party vendors, you extend compliance oversight across your entire network, complementing your internal efforts.

International Data Transfers and SCCs

Transferring personal data outside the EEA demands extra care under GDPR. While some countries are recognized as having adequate data protection laws, others - like the United States - require additional safeguards.

The most commonly used safeguard is the Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), which are pre-approved templates from the European Commission. These legally bind data exporters and importers to specific data protection standards. If you’re still using the old SCCs, note that the updated versions, introduced in June 2021, must replace them by December 27, 2022.

In addition to SCCs, GDPR now requires Transfer Impact Assessments (TIAs) for all international transfers. These assessments evaluate whether the destination country’s laws and practices might compromise your chosen safeguards. For example, when transferring data to the United States, you’ll need to assess risks like government surveillance and consider measures like advanced encryption to protect the data.

Document your TIA findings and revisit them regularly, especially as laws evolve in the destination country. Tailor the assessment to your specific use case, factoring in the type of data, processing purpose, and storage duration.

Creating a Vendor Risk Register

A vendor risk register can help you maintain GDPR compliance by organizing and tracking third-party risks. This document should list every vendor that processes personal data, along with their compliance status and any associated risks or mitigation steps.

Include details such as the vendor’s name, services provided, contract dates, DPA status, security certifications, data transfer mechanisms, and a risk rating. Assign higher risk levels to vendors handling sensitive or large volumes of data, or those with weaker security measures.

Regular reviews are essential to keep the register up-to-date. High-risk vendors should be reviewed quarterly, while lower-risk vendors can be checked annually. During these reviews, verify certifications, check for new subprocessors, and monitor for changes in data handling practices or security incidents.

Keep track of contract renewal dates to avoid gaps in compliance. Set automated reminders 90 days before contracts expire to allow time for renegotiations, particularly for DPAs. Also, monitor vendor security bulletins and set up Google Alerts for updates on key suppliers. If a vendor experiences a security incident, assess whether it impacts your data and determine if you need to notify users or authorities.

Consider using a vendor scoring system to prioritize your efforts. For example, vendors with recent SOC 2 reports, clear breach protocols, and responsive support might score higher. This approach helps allocate resources effectively.

Finally, document exit strategies for each vendor. If a vendor fails to meet compliance standards or suffers a major security breach, you’ll need a plan to transition to another service without disrupting operations or compromising data security.

Maintaining Long-Term GDPR Compliance

Ensuring long-term compliance with GDPR isn’t a one-and-done effort - it demands consistent attention and a workforce that truly understands the regulations.

Employee Training and Awareness Programs

Training employees on GDPR transforms abstract rules into practical actions they can apply daily. This not only reduces risks but also builds trust and improves efficiency. To make training effective, customize it for specific roles - whether it’s leadership, Data Protection Officers (DPOs), IT staff, marketers, HR professionals, or customer service teams. Each of these groups faces unique challenges under GDPR, and targeted training helps address them. This kind of tailored approach also sets the stage for broader initiatives like regular audits and keeping data mapping processes up to date.

Conclusion: Building Trust Through GDPR Compliance

By adopting the strategies and measures outlined earlier, GDPR compliance becomes more than just a way to avoid hefty fines - it’s a way to earn your users' trust and stand out in a competitive market. Taking privacy seriously sends a clear message to your customers: their data is in safe hands.

From robust security protocols to careful vetting of third-party vendors and continuous employee training, these efforts come together to create a strong privacy-first approach. This not only protects your business from potential regulatory issues but also reassures customers that their information is handled with care. In a world where data breaches seem to dominate the news, prioritizing privacy can make your service a trusted choice.

Compliance isn’t just about legal protection - it’s about strengthening customer relationships. When users trust your platform, they’re more likely to engage with your services and recommend them to others. That trust becomes a cornerstone for sustained growth and smoother operations in the long run.

Need help ensuring your platform is GDPR-compliant? At Zee Palm, our team blends technical know-how with a deep understanding of GDPR requirements. We’ll help you build privacy directly into your platform from day one, making it a fundamental part of your service.

FAQs

What challenges do SaaS platforms face with GDPR compliance, and how can they address them?

SaaS platforms often grapple with hurdles like adhering to intricate GDPR requirements across different regions, safeguarding personal data through encryption, obtaining explicit user consent, and keeping detailed records of how data is processed. These tasks can become especially overwhelming for businesses managing large-scale or international operations.

To tackle these issues, companies should prioritize data minimization - collecting only the information that’s absolutely necessary. Implementing strong encryption methods is essential to protect sensitive data from breaches. Equally important is creating clear and straightforward consent processes that users can easily understand. Lastly, keeping comprehensive records of all data processing activities not only ensures compliance but also showcases accountability during audits or regulatory checks.

When does a SaaS company need to appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO) under GDPR?

Under GDPR, a Data Protection Officer (DPO) is mandatory for a SaaS company if its core activities involve large-scale, regular, and systematic monitoring of individuals or the handling of sensitive personal data on a significant scale. This requirement becomes especially critical when these activities have a major impact on individuals' privacy rights.

Moreover, if the company operates as a public authority or body, appointing a DPO is not optional - it’s a legal obligation. Even when not strictly required, having a DPO can signal a strong commitment to safeguarding data and maintaining GDPR compliance.

How can SaaS platforms effectively manage GDPR compliance risks when working with third-party vendors?

To navigate GDPR compliance risks when working with third-party vendors, SaaS platforms need a proactive and structured approach. Start by conducting thorough due diligence and regular risk evaluations, such as Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs). Group your vendors by their risk levels to prioritize efforts and maintain ongoing monitoring of their compliance status.

It's also crucial to establish solid contractual agreements that explicitly require vendors to adhere to GDPR standards. These agreements should cover essential data security and privacy practices. To make the process smoother, consider using tools or systems that help manage data collection, track vendor activities, and verify compliance. By taking these steps, SaaS platforms can reduce potential risks and stay aligned with GDPR obligations.

Related Blog Posts

• 5 Steps for Mobile App Compliance: HIPAA, GDPR, ADA
• 7 SaaS Security Risks & How to Prevent Them
• 10 SaaS UX Design Best Practices 2024
• How SaaS Platforms Handle Export Control Laws

Behavioral grouping looks at how your SaaS users work with your app, not just things like age or place. This way helps you know more about what users need, keep them longer, and make more money. Here's why it's big and how to start:

• Why It’s Big: SaaS works best with users that stay active. Grouping by what users do (like how often they use a feature or log in) helps tell who might leave, makes starting out better, and makes it more personal. For instance, Amazon's suggestions based on behavior form 35% of its sales.
• Main Things to See: Watch how often features are used, how often users log in, how long they stay, if they finish tasks, and if they move up or down in plans.
• Tools to Try: Some top tools are Mixpanel, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, and UXCam to track how users act.
• Good Things: By using behavior grouping, companies like HubSpot saw money made jump by 760% and could keep users better by meeting what they need.

How to Segement Your Customers #b2bsaas #founderadvice

Issues with Old Ways of Grouping SaaS Users

A lot of SaaS firms sort their users by simple things such as age, how big the company is, or where they are. This way might look right, but it often fails to show how users really use the product and cuts down on chances for growth.

Fixed Groupings in a Changing SaaS Space

Old-style grouping thinks that users do not change over time. For example, a marketing boss at a company with 500 people may be put into a group once and never moved. But in the SaaS space, what users need and how they act change all the time. An early user might begin with simple tools and soon become a very skilled user. Or, someone might use the app a lot at first and then less as their team’s work changes.

Why does this matter? Think about this: around 80% of shoppers are more likely to stay with brands that shape experiences just for them. Fixed grouping misses these changes in how users act, leading to lost chances. Here’s where old ways don't do well:

Old WayWhat It LacksThe Real EffectAge, gender infoHow users shift in what they likeUsers see things they don't care forSize of businessSpecial needs one user may haveAll get the same answer, which might not workPlace dataLikes for certain parts or waysWrong pushes in making things

Here's a simple view: A SaaS firm may think all big firm users need top features. Yet, many may just want simple tools for daily work. This wrong match can waste effort on things only a few will use.

User roles change a lot too, making set groups tricky. Plus, if you split groups by stuff other than how they act, you may get users wrong.

The Dangers of Getting Data Wrong

If you depend too much on static data, you could misjudge your users - this may lead to bad choices that hurt your firm. Two firms may seem the same in terms of type, size, and place. But one may want deep analysis, the other just simple reports.

The risks are big. Forrester says if your plans don't match what buyers want, B2B firms can lose up to 10% of their money each year. Wrong data can cause:

• Wrong focus on features: Making features for just a few wastes time and cash.
• Bad pricing rules: Basing price on an "average" user misses out on unique needs and different budgets.
• Poor new user help: Thinking all users need the same help turns off both tech-smart users and those who need more help.
• More users leaving: About 30% of SaaS firms see more users leave because of group issues. Bad groups make it hard to see users are unhappy.

Outdated or not enough data make this worse, making user groups useless. Also, the lack of personal touch is growing - 66% of buyers say they are put off by content that isn't for them.

To really know and help your users, you need to look past fixed groups. Watching how users act gives the insights needed to adjust and do better in the SaaS world.

Using Behavioral Groups in SaaS

Simple groups often miss what users want. To fix this, use a live method - behavioral groups. By watching key user moves, picking the right tools and keeping to privacy rules, you can make a more personal and strong SaaS feel.

Main Behavioral Info to Watch

A huge 83% of buyers will share their info if it makes their experience feel more theirs. This shows why it's key to think well and plan well with behavioral info.

Begin by looking at how features are used. See where they click, how long they stay, and what parts are passed over. Like, some might use just the easy report tools, while others go deep into big data tools. This info shows you separate groups of users.

Then, look at how often they log in, how long they stay each time, and when they use your service. These things show how into it your users are and help you set the best times for alerts. Also, watch how often they finish tasks to see where they give up in your steps, so you can fix these hard spots.

Look at upgrade and downgrade moves. Users who upgrade fast often act different than those who stick with free stuff. If they downgrade a lot, it could mean there are big problems to solve.

Trends in help tickets give you more good ideas. If users keep asking for help on the same features, it might mean you need better start guides or more clear talks.

Think about how Netflix does it: they shape suggestions by watching what shows users like, when they pause, and when they stop watching. This not only pulls people in more, but also helps keep them longer.

After seeing these key moves, your next step is to find the best tools to gather and look at this data well.

Tools for Getting Behavioral Data

Your pick of data tools depends on what you want and your money limit. Different services are good at different parts of watching behavior, so you need to match your needs with what they can do.

• Mixpanel: Great for event watching, it shows deep info on how users act on web and mobile. Very good in funnel study and group tracking (4.6/5 stars on G2).
• Amplitude: This tool looks at group study and guessing analytics, helping see patterns like when users might leave or upgrade (4.5/5 stars on G2).
• Google Analytics 4: While not very focused on behavioral study, it gives full traffic and user find reports. Works well with other Google tools and is free, making it a good first choice (4.5/5 stars on G2).
• UXCam: Best for mobile apps, it looks deeply at user feel on mobile (4.6/5 stars on G2).
• Heap Analytics: This service watches user moves by itself, saving time and hard work.
• FullSession: A tool that shows how users move in your app, letting you visually see where they find it hard (5/5 stars on G2).

ToolGood ForMain StrengthMixpanelSeeing user actionsDeep look at user actionsAmplitudeSeeing what might happenGroup study and lost user guessGoogle Analytics 4Tracking many platformsNo cost, full data lookUXCamApps on phonesKnowing how phone users actHeap AnalyticsEasy trackingNo need to set it up yourself

Putting it all together matters. The tools you pick to look at data should fit well with what you use now - like your CRM, email tools, help desks, and billing. They must offer a full view of how what users do helps or hurts your work.

Stay Safe and Follow the Law

When you group users by their actions, you must respect their privacy. It's not just good to do; it’s key to keep their trust and guard your firm. Breaking the rules can bring big fines and people leaving your brand.

If your users are in Europe, following GDPR is vital. This means you get clear yes from them to use their data, and not just through service terms. Not doing so can stop you from using data well.

Begin by knowing your data. Write down all the personal details your site gathers, uses, and saves, like clicks and what they watch. Know where this is kept, who sees it, and how long it stays.

Handling consent must start early in your product. Use methods that make it easy for users to say yes, no, or change their mind. A simple pop-up about cookies isn't enough - they should get to choose what info they share.

To keep user info safe, make data secure and limit who can see it. Not all your team needs to know sensitive user details.

Also, be ready for surprises. Create an action plan for problems to deal with data leaks. You should inform the people affected and the right authorities within 72 hours. A bad handle on a leak can lose customer faith fast.

If your platform deals with lots of sensitive info, think about naming a Data Protection Officer (DPO). Regular checks can keep you in line with current privacy rules.

Using Behavioral Insights to Grow Your SaaS

When you sort out good groups and gather data right, behavior clues can make clear plans from raw info. With the right tools and care for privacy, use this info to lift how much users use your service and cut how much they leave.

Checking User Groups for More Stays

Group checks sort users by what they do the same and sees how they do over days. This way helps find trends that may show who may leave, giving you a shot to step in with better stay plans. For example, signs like fewer log-ins, quick log-offs, or more help calls can point to possible leaving. Forecast checks can then use past behavior info to see who might risk leaving, letting you sort users and give focused re-try hard efforts.

Begin by checking how good your first welcome is. If playing drops a lot in the first two weeks, look at group changes to see what’s not right. Watching what your best users do can also show what keeps users.

Plans that stress learning key parts do well when you focus on parts that keep users. For instance, BacklinkManager shows steps like "Pick goals" and "Put in a job" in their later welcome list because these moves help keep users there. If some users haven't picked up main parts, custom plans can help them use it right.

Cutting leaving by just 5% has shown to up gains by from 25% to 125%. Also, true users tend to spend 67% more than new ones, and they spend 33% more each buy compared to first-time buyers. These clues can lead to product shifts that make users want to stay.

Making UX Design Better with Behavior Info

Behavior info tells you just where users hit snags in your app, giving you clear ways to make design better. Don't guess - use drop-off checks to map stay lines for clear user groups and spot where users lose fun or hit blocks. This helps you see which parts of your face need more work.

For example, Spotify used behavior checks to make its menus simple and stress custom tips, which made more users lock in and learn parts. In the same way, Airbnb used A/B tests and made parts fit -like shaping the start page by place and past books- to make using it more fun.

Live walk-throughs can boost learning parts by up to three times over still guides. Step-by-step welcomes, which show parts bit by bit based on user jobs or first plays, help users get your product without feeling swamped. Companies that tune their welcome with behavior info have seen up to a 71% jump in user starts. By matching UX design with user acts, you can make a SaaS feel that feels easy and just for them.

Making the SaaS Feel Yours

Data on how people act doesn't just make them stay or like the design better - it also lets you change things just for them. When you break down habits, you can make things that fit what each person wants. By knowing how groups use your stuff, you can tweak parts, show things right, and suggest stuff they need. Making it personal really works: 88% of U.S. marketing pros say they see good changes with personal plans, and 70% of buyers say if a firm gets what they need, they stick around.

For example, ConvertKit asks new users to pick roles in a welcome quiz, making the start fit their goals. Also, smart tips point users to tools and options that keep them using the service for long.

You can change how you talk too. Like, send different emails to users who aren't active than to those who use a lot. Mix what you know about how users act with what they want to make things that matter to them more, and bring them closer to your product.

sbb-itb-8abf120

Ending: How Simple User Study Changes SaaS

User study changes how SaaS firms get and help their people. Not like the old ways that use simple things like age or place, this way looks at user acts in your app. The end? More happy users and more money - shown by clear results in the field.

Most buyers like brands that make things just for them. By looking at user acts, you can make deals that fit them and bring real wins for business. For example, seeing when use drops or goals are missed helps spot users close to leaving, so you can act to keep them. These made-for-them experiences can lift user joy by 20% and raise sales by 10–15%.

User acts are key in making products too by showing what parts users like most. As said before, these clues make products, prices, and starting steps better. Not all customers are the same, and user study shows the special ways that make your firm do well.

For SaaS firms wanting to grow, this way turns simple data into plans that make user ties, keep users, and up money. The real test? Using these clues fast to drive smart growth.

FAQs

How does breaking down user habits help keep them using SaaS tools?

Breaking User Habits Helps Keep Them with SaaS Businesses

Breaking down user habits steps up user staying power by looking at how users work with an app, not just at still data like age or jobs. By looking into actions like how much users log in, what parts they use most, or how they buy, SaaS groups can make perfect fits for clear needs. The end? More use, more trust, and fewer users leaving.

Old ways like sorting by age or job type often miss the mark in getting the whole view. On the flip side, action data digs in deeper, giving SaaS groups a leg up. It lets them spot user troubles early, fine-tune parts to suit user likes, and send messages that hit home. All these lead to a user feel that brings people back.

What problems can come up when you use behavioral data to sort users on a SaaS platform?

Hard Parts of Putting Behavioral Data to Use in SaaS

Using behavioral data to sort users on a SaaS platform can be hard. It's full of tough spots. One big issue is getting good, right data on how users act. Without this good data, you might make user groups that don't match how people really act. This could lead to plans that don't work well.

Another problem? Making user behaviors too simple. When you put users into too-broad groups, you could end up with plain, all-the-same answers. These might not hit the mark for all in your group. Also, not good use of data on user trends can waste stuff and let chances to keep users or grow slide by.

Using this way of sorting users can really change how users feel and help a business do well. But, it needs careful work and smart action to dodge these usual slips.

Related posts

• 10 Essential Mobile App Metrics to Track in 2024
• Top 10 Mobile App Analytics Tools 2024
• 10 SaaS UX Design Best Practices 2024
• 9 Steps to Create Data-Driven User Personas

When scaling a design system, choosing the right collaboration model is essential for managing growth and maintaining efficiency. The article outlines four main models, each suited to different team sizes, workflows, and organizational needs:

• Centralized: A single team manages the system, ensuring consistency but risking bottlenecks as demand grows. Ideal for small teams or early-stage systems.
• Federated: Responsibility is shared across teams, balancing oversight and flexibility. Best for larger organizations with multiple products.
• Community-Driven: Open participation from all team members fosters engagement but requires strong governance to avoid inconsistencies. Works well for mature organizations with collaborative cultures.
• Contribution: Teams actively develop components with structured processes, distributing workload and speeding up growth. Suitable for organizations with high request volumes.

Each model has unique trade-offs in collaboration, governance, scalability, and speed. Selecting the right approach depends on your organization’s size, maturity, and workload. Below is a quick comparison to help you decide.

Quick Comparison

ModelProsConsBest ForCentralizedStrong consistency, clear decision-makingBottlenecks, limited flexibilitySmall teams or early-stage systemsFederatedShared workload, promotes collaborationRisk of inconsistencies, requires coordinationLarger teams managing multiple productsCommunity-DrivenHigh engagement, diverse perspectivesSlower decisions, needs strong governanceMature organizations with collaborative culturesContributionSpeeds up growth, shared ownershipRequires clear processes, structured oversightHigh-volume, fast-growing organizations

Your collaboration model should align with your team’s current needs while preparing for future growth.

In the file: Building a collaborative design system at scale

1. Centralized Model

The centralized model places full control in the hands of a single, dedicated design team. This team oversees the creation of components, establishes guidelines, maintains documentation, and approves updates, ensuring consistency across the entire organization.

Other teams - such as product, engineering, and design teams - primarily act as users rather than contributors. Any requests for new components or updates must go through this central team, making it the gatekeeper of the design system.

Collaboration Level

In this model, the core team drives all decisions, while other teams provide feedback or submit requests. This separation allows product teams to focus on their projects without worrying about maintaining design system standards. However, this structure can sometimes result in lower engagement from product teams, as they may feel disconnected from the system's development. The trade-off is clear: the organization gains consistency, but at the expense of diverse input. This dynamic is further reinforced by the governance structure's strict controls.

Governance Structure

Governance in the centralized model relies on a top-down approach. The core team establishes standards, reviews contributions, and has the final say on what gets added to the design system. While this hierarchy ensures clear roles and responsibilities, it can also create bottlenecks if the core team becomes overwhelmed or struggles to address organizational needs promptly.

Scalability Potential

This model is well-suited for small to medium-sized organizations where the core team can effectively manage the workload while maintaining quality and consistency. However, as the organization grows, the central team's capacity may become a limiting factor. When more product teams require components, updates, or support, the increased demand can lead to delays that stretch out for weeks. Recognizing these constraints often signals the need to transition to a more distributed approach.

Speed of Iteration

The speed of iteration in the centralized model depends on the efficiency of the core team. A small, focused team can make decisions quickly, but as demand increases, the workload may slow progress. This model prioritizes quality over speed, ensuring that every component meets established standards before deployment.

For highly specialized teams, such as Zee Palm, the centralized model enforces strict design standards across complex projects. However, as project volume and complexity grow, balancing centralized control with the flexibility needed for customization becomes increasingly challenging.

Ultimately, the centralized model excels at maintaining design consistency but may struggle to scale quickly as organizational demands increase.

2. Federated Model

The federated model shifts away from a centralized approach by distributing the responsibility for the design system across multiple teams. Instead of relying on a single dedicated group, this approach empowers individual teams to contribute components and updates, all while adhering to core guidelines established by a central oversight team.

In this setup, teams are seen as active collaborators. They focus on their specific projects while also playing a role in shaping and evolving the broader design system. This creates a shared sense of responsibility and collaboration across the organization. Let’s dive deeper into how this model fosters teamwork and maintains structure.

Collaboration Level

The federated model thrives on cross-functional collaboration. Teams from various parts of the organization actively contribute to the design system, promoting shared ownership and bringing in diverse perspectives. Regular coordination ensures that contributions align with the system's overall vision, allowing teams to make changes while staying within defined boundaries.

To prevent inconsistencies, clear guidelines are critical. These standards help maintain alignment across teams, even as each group addresses its unique needs. For organizations with multiple product lines, this model is particularly effective - solutions developed by one team can often be reused by others facing similar challenges, creating a ripple effect of shared knowledge and efficiency.

Governance Structure

Governance in the federated model strikes a balance between autonomy and oversight. A core team sets the overarching standards and guidelines, but individual teams retain the freedom to contribute within these parameters. This ensures consistency without stifling creativity or adaptability.

To maintain quality and coordination, organizations often rely on documented contribution processes, review boards, and regular audits. These tools help streamline efforts across teams and identify potential conflicts before they escalate. The governance structure needs to be robust enough to uphold standards while flexible enough to accommodate the varying needs of different teams. Clear documentation, well-defined review processes, and proper training are essential to ensure teams can contribute effectively.

Scalability Potential

One of the key strengths of the federated model is its ability to scale alongside organizational growth. By distributing the workload and tapping into the expertise of multiple teams, this approach allows the design system to adapt and evolve without overburdening a single group. As new teams join, the system can expand naturally, addressing diverse needs more effectively.

However, scalability relies heavily on strong governance and clear communication to prevent fragmentation. For organizations with fewer than 20 designers, this model is often manageable, but larger teams may struggle to maintain cohesion without more structured oversight. It’s also a practical choice for organizations testing the waters with design systems, as it requires minimal upfront investment and stakeholder buy-in.

Speed of Iteration

The federated model can significantly accelerate iteration by enabling multiple teams to work on different components simultaneously, bypassing the bottlenecks of centralized approval processes. This parallel approach allows the system to evolve faster than it would under a single-team model.

That said, the speed advantage depends on effective governance and communication. Without clear standards or proper coordination, teams risk delays or conflicting updates. Regular synchronization meetings are crucial to ensure everyone stays aligned and avoids duplicating efforts.

For example, teams like Zee Palm use the flexibility of the federated model to iterate quickly across various projects. By contributing directly to the design system while focusing on client deliverables, they can adapt to specific project needs without compromising overall consistency.

Success in this model hinges on establishing clear contribution guidelines from the start and ensuring all teams understand their roles within the larger system. When executed well, the federated model combines rapid iteration with consistent quality, even across multiple projects running in parallel.

3. Community-Driven Model

The community-driven model thrives on open participation, inviting contributions from anyone within the organization. Unlike centralized or federated models, which restrict input to a select group, this approach encourages designers, developers, product managers, and other stakeholders to suggest updates or introduce new components. By doing so, it transforms the design system into a dynamic, evolving platform shaped by continuous input - a bottom-up approach that fosters inclusivity and collaboration. This contrasts sharply with the controlled, hierarchical nature of centralized and federated systems.

Collaboration Level

Collaboration reaches its peak with the community-driven model. Everyone, regardless of their role, is encouraged to share ideas and insights, creating a rich mix of perspectives. This openness often leads to solutions and components that might not emerge from a smaller, more isolated team. A great example of this is GitLab's Pajamas design system. In 2023, GitLab allowed any team member to propose changes, a move that helped the system stay aligned with organizational needs. This open approach not only improved adoption but also enhanced satisfaction among product teams.

Governance Structure

While open participation is the cornerstone of this model, strong governance is crucial to ensure quality and consistency. Without clear oversight, the system could easily become fragmented. Typically, a group of maintainers or a dedicated committee reviews contributions to ensure they meet established standards. Proposals are discussed and refined collaboratively to maintain cohesion while encouraging innovation. For instance, in 2023, the Dutch Government adopted a "Relay Model" for their design system, enabling multiple teams to contribute through a structured review process. This ensured the system remained adaptable and effective for diverse needs. Transparent guidelines and clear review processes are vital for helping new contributors engage confidently while safeguarding the system's integrity.

Scalability Potential

The community-driven model's reliance on collective expertise makes it highly scalable. With more individuals and teams contributing, the system can quickly adapt to changing requirements without overloading a central team. However, this scalability depends on robust governance. Without proper oversight, there's a risk of inconsistency or fragmentation. To sustain growth, organizations must invest in thorough documentation, well-defined standards, and effective communication tools.

Speed of Iteration

This model's open nature accelerates idea generation but can slow down decision-making due to the need for consensus. While multiple contributors can quickly propose diverse solutions, reaching agreement often takes longer compared to models driven by a core team. For example, teams managing varied project types, like those at Zee Palm, benefit from the flexibility of this approach. It allows teams to address specific challenges while leveraging insights from across the organization. Striking the right balance between rapid innovation and rigorous review is key to maintaining both speed and quality. This trade-off is a defining feature of the community-driven model and highlights its unique dynamics compared to other collaboration methods.

sbb-itb-8abf120

4. Contribution Model

The contribution model takes collaboration to the next level by introducing structured ownership. This approach allows teams to actively shape and improve the design system, moving beyond just offering suggestions. Unlike the open-ended participation of a community-driven model, this method emphasizes structured participation, providing clear steps for implementation.

Collaboration Level

This model encourages teams to take an active role in building the system, not just brainstorming ideas. Teams are responsible for turning their concepts into reality, fostering a deeper sense of ownership and commitment to the system's success. Collaboration here goes beyond discussions - it involves hands-on development.

A great example is LaunchDarkly, which provides detailed documentation to guide contributors through the process. This support system ensures contributors have the confidence and resources to implement changes themselves, rather than merely submitting requests.

Governance Structure

To maintain quality and consistency, the contribution model relies on a well-defined governance system. Typically, a core team or committee oversees contributions, ensuring they align with the design system’s standards and principles. This balance is crucial as the system grows and serves diverse teams.

For instance, some organizations use structured review processes to ensure quality while fostering a collaborative culture. This approach not only keeps the system evolving efficiently but also promotes shared knowledge among contributors. Detailed guidelines and documentation are vital, enabling contributors to work independently while safeguarding the system’s integrity.

Scalability Potential

The contribution model shines when it comes to scaling. By distributing development work across teams, it ensures the design system can grow alongside the organization without overburdening a small core team. Unlike centralized models, this approach eliminates bottlenecks by tapping into the collective capacity of multiple teams.

That said, scalability depends on robust governance. Organizations need efficient review workflows, automated quality checks, and clear contribution paths to prevent fragmentation or inconsistency as the system expands.

Speed of Iteration

With contributions happening in parallel, this model speeds up the journey from concept to implementation. It’s especially effective for complex industries like AI, healthcare, and SaaS, where domain-specific needs must be addressed without compromising the system’s overall coherence. Teams can focus on contributions that directly impact their projects while benefiting the entire organization.

Clear and well-documented processes reduce friction, making it easier to integrate contributions quickly. When these systems function smoothly, teams can iterate faster while maintaining the quality and consistency that make design systems so valuable. This approach aligns with agile practices seen in federated models, ensuring efficient integration without sacrificing robustness.

Model Comparison: Advantages and Disadvantages

After breaking down the different models, let’s compare their strengths and weaknesses to help guide decisions on scaling your design system. Each model has its own trade-offs, making it suitable for different organizational needs.

ModelAdvantagesDisadvantagesBest ForCentralizedEnsures strong consistency and quality control; Clear authority for decisions; Unified brand identityCan create bottlenecks; Limited flexibility; Struggles to scale with growthSmall teams or early-stage design systemsFederatedReduces bottlenecks by distributing workload; Encourages innovation; Promotes collaboration through shared responsibilityRisk of inconsistencies if guidelines aren’t strictly followed; Requires strong communication and coordinationLarger teams managing multiple productsCommunity-DrivenBoosts adoption and engagement; Brings in diverse perspectives; Encourages collective decision-makingHard to maintain consistency and quality; Slower decision-making; Needs robust governanceOrganizations with a mature, collaborative cultureContributionAllows teams to contribute without overwhelming the core team; Speeds up system growth; Builds a culture of shared ownershipRequires clear, documented review processes; Needs structured governance to ensure qualityOrganizations with high request volumes that exceed core team capacity

This table serves as a roadmap for aligning each model with your organization’s specific needs.

Collaboration and Governance

Collaboration levels vary widely across these models. The centralized approach offers low collaboration but excels in maintaining control and consistency. On the other end, community-driven models promote very high collaboration, though this often slows decision-making. Federated and contribution models strike a balance, offering high collaboration with a manageable level of governance overhead.

Governance structures also differ significantly. Centralized models rely on strict control by a single team, ensuring consistency but creating bottlenecks as organizations grow. In contrast, contribution-based governance allows broader participation while maintaining quality through structured processes.

Scalability and Speed

When it comes to scalability, centralized models tend to hit limits as demand increases. Federated and contribution models, however, excel at distributing workloads across multiple teams. Transparent contribution processes, like those seen in Nitro’s implementation, can balance growth and control by using simple tools like forms for token requests, fostering continuous improvements.

Speed of iteration isn't solely tied to the model but rather to process design. Centralized models can handle simple changes quickly but slow down with heavy request volumes. Clear documentation and streamlined review processes can help maintain speed even as demands grow.

Resource Considerations and Maturity

Resource needs depend heavily on team size and organizational maturity. Small teams can often succeed with minimal setups, while larger teams require dedicated resources, specialized tools, and formal governance structures. Startups typically benefit from centralized models early on, transitioning to federated or contribution models as their needs expand. A key sign that it’s time to shift is when the core team becomes overwhelmed with requests, signaling the need for a more scalable, collaborative approach.

Conclusion

When choosing a collaboration model for your design system, consider your team's size and needs. A centralized model works well for smaller teams, while a federated approach suits growing organizations. For more established teams with a mature culture, a community-driven model can thrive. If your team handles a high volume of work, a contribution-based model may be the best fit. The right model should align with your organization's scale and workflow, ensuring it supports your growth effectively.

Governance plays a critical role in maintaining order and efficiency within your design system. Clear guidelines, well-documented processes, and flexible governance structures can transform potential chaos into streamlined collaboration. Industry examples, like those shared by Zee Palm, highlight how structured yet adaptable governance can lead to success. With the right approach, design system collaboration can accelerate progress without sacrificing quality.

As your team evolves, so should your design system. Successful organizations often start with a simple model and adapt as their needs grow. For instance, when your team reaches around 20 designers, it's time to consider dedicating resources specifically to your design system. Planning for such transitions early on can help you avoid bottlenecks that could hinder your scaling efforts.

Ultimately, your collaboration model should serve both the designers contributing to the system and the end users engaging with its products. Achieving the right balance between control and creativity, consistency and speed, and structure and adaptability is essential for sustained success.

FAQs

How can I choose the right collaboration model for scaling my organization's design system?

Choosing the right collaboration model to scale your design system hinges on several factors, including your team's structure, project objectives, and available resources. Begin by assessing how complex your design system is and determining the extent of collaboration required across teams. For instance, centralized models are ideal for smaller teams aiming for uniformity, while federated or hybrid models are better suited for larger organizations with varying needs.

Engaging key stakeholders early in the process is crucial. Aligning on priorities ensures the collaboration model you select promotes both scalability and efficiency. And if you need expert help to implement solutions that scale effectively, our team of skilled developers can work with you to create systems tailored to your specific requirements.

What are the main governance challenges in a community-driven design system model, and how can they be addressed?

Community-driven design systems often hit roadblocks like inconsistent contributions, unclear accountability, and struggles to maintain a cohesive vision. These challenges tend to surface when multiple contributors work independently without clear direction or oversight.

To tackle these issues, start by creating clear contribution guidelines that outline expectations and processes. Forming a dedicated core team to review and approve changes ensures accountability and keeps the system on track. Regular communication - whether through team check-ins or shared updates - helps keep everyone aligned and focused. Tools like version control systems and thorough documentation can also play a big role in simplifying collaboration and preserving quality across the design system.

What are the steps for transitioning from a centralized design system model to a federated or contribution-based model as an organization grows?

Transitioning from a centralized design system to one that’s based on contributions or a federated model takes thoughtful planning and teamwork. The first step is to put clear governance structures in place. These structures help maintain consistency while giving teams the freedom to contribute meaningfully. Shared guidelines, thorough documentation, and reliable tools are key to keeping everyone aligned.

Fostering open communication is equally important. Set up regular check-ins, create feedback loops, and provide shared spaces where teams can collaborate and exchange ideas. As responsibilities are gradually handed over to individual teams, it’s essential to maintain some level of oversight to prevent the system from becoming disjointed. This balanced approach ensures the design system can grow and evolve without losing its core structure.

Related Blog Posts

• UX Design Documentation Guide [2024]
• Top 10 Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) Tools 2024
• How to Build a Design System
• Design Systems vs. Style Guides: Key Differences

In Today's rapid and busy world, the fitness industry is gaining a lot of attention. Especially during COVID-19 when people were not able to go anywhere and had to stay inside their houses to protect themselves from this deadly disease. People started to worry about their health and fitness. Since people cannot go outside of their houses to the gym, a hike in fitness apps took place in the market. People started to prioritize their health, began working out, and started using fitness apps.

Role of Fitness Apps

Fitness apps are playing a big role in transforming the workout industry. Especially for busy working people and stay-at-home mothers who don't have time to go to the gym or consult a nutrition specialist, a fitness app is a great alternative for them. According to an article in 2020, fitness apps saw a 46% increase in downloads worldwide due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The hype of fitness apps is ever-growing. Fitness apps have over two billion active users and the fitness app market is expected to reach $14.7 billion by 2026. A drastic change can be seen in these years. They have made exercises more accessible and easier, allowing users to work out at their own pace while monitoring what's best for them, from diets to different daily exercises. Fitness apps also motivate users by introducing features like daily log goals, rewards, and goal tracking. You also get personalized plans and routines so you can work accordingly. Fitness apps can track your steps, calories burned, heart rate, and body measurements. Moreover, new technologies, such as wearable devices that collect data on the user's progress by installing these apps on the devices, are giving a new dimension to the fitness industry.

Different Domains of Fitness Apps

There are a lot of different categories of fitness apps that are available. A few of these are:

Workout and Exercise Apps

Most of these apps give users a properly planned workout routine and different exercises from cardio to HIIT. Give different training plans, instructions, and video demonstrations of the exercises to improve the user's fitness and health.

Nutrition and Diet Apps‍

These apps provide the user with a proper diet plan, including tracking calorie intake, proteins, and nutrients of the meal. They also help users make healthy choices and suggest different recipes to try, providing good suggestions for improving their health and maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

Running and Cardio Apps

‍Apps like these keep track of the user's running, walking, and cardio activities. They monitor distance measurements, steps taken, and the burning of calories. These apps also provide features like GPS tracking, setting certain goals, and daily achievement log bars, ensuring that users can benefit from them and maintain a healthy life.

Weight and Heart Rate Tracking Apps

‍Weight tracking apps help users track and manage their progress, including tracking body measurements and comparing their weight journey, whether it is to lose or gain weight. Heart rate tracking apps keep track of user heart rates, ensuring that they are in a normal range.

These apps are improving the fitness industry gaining more followers as not many people can afford to go gym and have a personal diet planner. Even people with busy schedules prefer the apps over going to the actual places.

The Positives of the Fitness Apps

There is a wide range of benefits of these apps in the workout industry. Some of them are:

Convenience

‍Fitness apps allow users to work out according to their preferred time. Users can work out anytime and anywhere as it is available at all times. they are also quite flexible allowing users with busy schedules to create their workout timing and routines. The users don’t even need workout equipment if they don’t have it as it provides hand full amount of exercises.

Personalization

‍These apps also provide users with benefits like personalization. Users can input their fitness goals, body measurements, and any concerns related to their health to develop planned workouts specially made for these individuals and according to their requirements. Individuals can also choose what time is best for them. Things like these may not be available at a traditional gym.

Variety‍

These apps provide the user with a variety of workout and diet plan options.From traditional workouts to HIIT and Yoga. Different dance workouts are also available for those who are bored of the same boring workouts. These apps also suggest different diet plans and recipes for the user. So, they can choose the best workouts and diet plans according to their mood.

Cost Effective

‍Fitness apps are very cost-effective in comparison to the prices of actually going to the gym and nutrient specialists for diet plans. A Lot of them are free and the ones that are not free are also quite affordable. They are also flexible and users can choose the best time for themselves.

Workout Tracking

‍These apps also allow users to keep track of their workouts and monitor their journey. They also provide information about the percentages and differences that have occurred in this progress. Moreover, these apps help users stay motivated and provide them with statistics to improve their fitness journey.

What does the Future Hold for the Fitness Apps Industry

The fitness app industry is booming, and in the upcoming digital world, it is going to evolve even further. More virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) gyms and apps are going to be introduced. Digital devices that can accurately measure body temperature, health rates, and weight will be developed. Artificial intelligence (AI) will introduce features like virtual instructors, planned workouts, and accurate feedback. Moreover, more entertaining game-based fitness apps will be introduced, such as parkour and reward-collecting games combined with fitness apps.

Real-Time Fitness Apps

Some of the famous fitness applications are:‍

Nike Training Club

Nike Training Club offers a wide range of workouts that includes Strength training, HIIT, Cardio, and yoga training. Moreover, they provide video demonstrations, and instructions and also provide personalized recommendations by keeping track of their user progress. They have over 1.8 million active users.

7 Minute Workout

7-minute workout is another great fitness app. It takes only 7 minutes of your day and provides you with video demonstrations and timers. This is great in such a way busy people can easily use it as it takes only 7 minutes of your day. The exercises are easy and you can do that multiple times if you want. 7 Minute Workout is the #1 fitness app in 127 countries.‍

Zombies, Run!

Zombies, Run! Is an interesting fitness app that is also a story-based game. The story is about an apocalyptic world where the users are being chased by zombies. To stay alive you have to run and complete missions. It is a way to make running, jogging, and walking interesting so users don't get bored and try to complete way. It's a win-win app you get entertained and also fit.‍

MyFitnessPal

This is another great fitness app that keeps track of your calories and nutrition intake. This app offers meal plans and provides users with great recipes. This app has over 200 million users. You can also get personalized keto diet plans by giving your input such as weight and body measurements.

‍

Fitness apps are going to keep evolving in the workout industry. It can be seen in these last few years and it is expected that they are going to reshape the industry even more as it is the future and the need of this current era. The virtual world has shaped and moulded our lives according to our needs, and fitness apps offer us luxury as it saves our time, and travel cost, and we can schedule our workout according to our stamina, speed, and the type of exercise and diet suitable to us fully panned in our palms. This game changer has made lives easier, better, and reliable as well as contributing to the success of the industry.

For custom software development, visit us at Zee Palm

For free premium front-end flutter kits, visit Flutter Coded Templates

Check out free Flutter Components, visit Flutter Components Library